SEVERAL STATES HAVE PROPOSED LAWS TO REQUIRE URINE TEST FOR THOSE ON WELFARE. THIS SEEMS PERFECTLY FAIR TO ME IN THAT I MUST TAKE THIS TEST ON THE JOB IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR MY FAMILY AND PAY THE TAXES NEEDED TO PAY FOR THOSE ON WELFARE. BUT THEN, COMMON SENSE HAS NO PLACE IN THE WORLD OF PROGRESSIVES WHO WOULD OPPOSE THIS MEASURE. NOT, TOO MANY YEARS BACK PLACES THAT SOLD LIQUOR WERE CLOSED ON ELECTION DAY IN CERTAIN LOCALITIES FOR THE LEADERS REALIZED THAT DRUNKS COULDN'T CAST AN INTELLIGENT VOTE, SO WHY NOT A BREATHALYZER TEST AT THE POLLING PLACE, AFTER ALL WE WOULD NEVER ALLOW DRUNKS ON THE ASSEMBLY LINE IN A FACTORY SO WHY ALLOW THEM ON THE ASSEMBLY LINE THAT TURNS OUT OUR POLITICAL LEADERS---THE POLLING PLACE.IF YOU WANT MORE DETAILS THAT JUST MUDDY THE WATERS GO TO ANOTHER SITE THIS IS NOT THE PLACE FOR YOU!
STOP OBAMA IN 2012! GET YOUR Defeat Obama in 2012 WIDGET. FOLLOW LINK FOR DETAILS.
3 comments:
Dooode, it looks like your beer went flat.
Those on welfare will never have to do a urine test. The cost will be the part that is brought up as the reason not to do this. Well that and the libtard judges will say it's unconstitutional. Just how the game is played.
Have a terrific day. :)
I can understand that it's a problem for those who are incapacitated and on welfare. But they can easily be exempted, for the rest who are able bodied, they should be getting tested, forced to turn up for job interviews and made to work on jobs others won't do. Other people are working to pay for them, they work so can those on welfare.
If they don't like it then don't claim welfare.
Post a Comment