Newsmax

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Jesus Almost Banned at White House

"The baby Jesus almost banned from the White House". When I first read this story I was shocked, but then when my first shock and anger subsided I quickly realized who the man in the White House was and thought, "that's par for the course". This story comes from the New York Times, no friend of conservatives. It was reported that Desiree Rogers, the White House social secretary, said that this year the White House would have a non-religious Christmas. That would be like having an international 4th of July celebration or a non-religious Yum Kippur.

Traditionally the White House displays its "Creche", the Nativity Scene during the Christmas season. Desiree Rogers revealed that there had been serious discussions about banning the scene this year, but that finally decided to go along with tradition. The mere idea that the Obama's would even consider kicking the "baby Jesus" out of the White House is disgusting and repugnant to most Americans who live outside the beltway and no not travel in "progressive" circles as does our new president. Turning baby Jesus away from the White House Inn would remind people of King Herod and many would see Obama taking that role. I suppose this is one time our "political correct" president thought about the man on the street and decided not to cross him of this. But then there is always next year and the spectacle of the baby Jesus being booted from the White by a man who is looking more like a Muslim with each passing day looms as a distinct possibility. Read story.

14 comments:

TRESTIN MEACHAM said...

I'm sure they will find some other PC way to ruin the season. If his ego keeps going he will soon replace it with his own holiday. It could focus on his miraculous certificate of live birth.

Mr Pink Eyes said...

A "non-religious Christmas?" That expression doesn't even make sense. Honestly, it doesn't surprise me coming from this man. Nothing really does any more.

LD Jackson said...

I have to echo what Mr. Pink Eyes said. How do you have a non-religious Christmas? I thought this season was supposed to be all about that?

Snarky Basterd said...

You just gave me a great idea for a piece. Thanks man! I'll h/t ya.

Bitmap said...

I'm not sure anything is out of bounds for this President.

Teresa said...

Mr. Pink Eyes is right, a "non-religious Christmas?" doesn't make sense. But, these liberals don't make sense. I think that there minds have been warped so badly that they have no idea what common sense means. This administration stoops gutter low, so not much surprises me of what comes from BO or his minions.

TexasFred said...

A "non-religious Christmas?"

Has all the appeal of a non-alcoholic beer...

MK said...

"that's par for the course"

He is a leftist after all, they hate Christianity, always have and always will.

I'm actually surprised the scumbag didn't put the pedophile mohammed in there in place of Christ.

Debbie said...

Muslim Enid was certainly not non-religious, bug Iftar dinner.

They changed their mind, but the poop already hit the fan.

Debbie
Right Truth
http://www.righttruth.typepad.com

Ron Russell said...

Damn Fred, "all the appeal of non-alcoholic beer" that's a great analogy.

Ayrdale said...

Irrespective of that, this Kiwi wishes you and yours a happy and relaxed time with good people.

"laughter and the love of friends"

Dominique said...

I would like to ask the Obama's who they, "Christians" could have a non-religious Christmas and send Jesus packing.

SNAKE HUNTERS said...

Ron Russell - That's a fine piece of poetry on Debbie's Post!

If you have the time, I'd appreciate your placing it in S/H Comment Section.

Cordially, reb
___________________________________
www.lazyonebenn.blogspot.com
>

Ron Russell said...

Snake Hunter, I don't know the piece you are speaking about--I comment on Debbie's site each day, sorry!